I started writing Ginny after GoF but before OotP, which meant I had to do a lot of extrapolation from vanishingly brief canon scenes and from general knowledge about her family and the wizarding world. I think I got a fair amount right -- the direction of her development in OotP and HBP did not surprise me -- but I never much liked the way Rowling did that development. It was terribly clunky and surface-only, and she never seemed to realize that what she saw as spunkiness and charm are really bravado, a potentially dangerous temper, and a degree of social insensitivity.
It goes back to the way that the 'good guys' can get away with murder (literally, in Harry's case; I'm convinced he killed Quirrell, which nobody ever mentions after PS/SS) because they're Rowling's favored side, whereas the 'bad guys' are mercilessly punished for equal infractions. Ginny's behavior in HBP is very nearly a mirror of Draco's non-Dumbledore-related behavior, but Rowling's narrative condemns Draco and praises Ginny.
no subject
It goes back to the way that the 'good guys' can get away with murder (literally, in Harry's case; I'm convinced he killed Quirrell, which nobody ever mentions after PS/SS) because they're Rowling's favored side, whereas the 'bad guys' are mercilessly punished for equal infractions. Ginny's behavior in HBP is very nearly a mirror of Draco's non-Dumbledore-related behavior, but Rowling's narrative condemns Draco and praises Ginny.
I strongly dislike that.