Today's randomly chosen theme is: monotonous primitivism
I know very little about primitivism as an art school, though some works within that tradition are interesting, nice to look at, or occasionally both.
Primitivism as a social philosophy strikes me as inherently sociopathic, considering that the renunciation of modern civilization would essentially consign millions of people to death (through lack of the medical technology and social support systems that keep them alive), if not billions of people through renunciation of intensive agriculture. I think it's also inherently hypocritical to consider human technology something that must be gotten rid of when things like beaver dams are "natural," because the difference is really only one of scale. Life changes its environment to suit itself -- even plants do this. Furthermore, primitivism is inherently futile because it's human to create and connect, so how anyone expects to change human nature to remove those impulses is anyone's guess, particularly if your ideal social organization removes any way to coordinate large areas and populations, let alone compel them via force.
(...Apparently I have more thoughts on primitivism than I realized. Okay.)
Primitivism as a diet philosophy is just nonsensical, considering primitive humans' approach to food was basically "is it edible? then eat it!" and also would probably kill me given my allergies to most raw fruit and many raw vegetables.
---------------
In writing news, I have started scene 4 of "Guardian" ch. 17, and have written ~225 words so far. This doesn't need to be a very long scene, so I think I can probably knock it off in another day or two after which I can go back to scenes 2 and 3 to flesh them out and make sure scene 3 is hitting the right emotional notes. (Scene 2 is already fine on that front. I just need to make sure I've done the layout correctly so readers won't get lost when I start moving pieces around in scene 3.)
I know very little about primitivism as an art school, though some works within that tradition are interesting, nice to look at, or occasionally both.
Primitivism as a social philosophy strikes me as inherently sociopathic, considering that the renunciation of modern civilization would essentially consign millions of people to death (through lack of the medical technology and social support systems that keep them alive), if not billions of people through renunciation of intensive agriculture. I think it's also inherently hypocritical to consider human technology something that must be gotten rid of when things like beaver dams are "natural," because the difference is really only one of scale. Life changes its environment to suit itself -- even plants do this. Furthermore, primitivism is inherently futile because it's human to create and connect, so how anyone expects to change human nature to remove those impulses is anyone's guess, particularly if your ideal social organization removes any way to coordinate large areas and populations, let alone compel them via force.
(...Apparently I have more thoughts on primitivism than I realized. Okay.)
Primitivism as a diet philosophy is just nonsensical, considering primitive humans' approach to food was basically "is it edible? then eat it!" and also would probably kill me given my allergies to most raw fruit and many raw vegetables.
---------------
In writing news, I have started scene 4 of "Guardian" ch. 17, and have written ~225 words so far. This doesn't need to be a very long scene, so I think I can probably knock it off in another day or two after which I can go back to scenes 2 and 3 to flesh them out and make sure scene 3 is hitting the right emotional notes. (Scene 2 is already fine on that front. I just need to make sure I've done the layout correctly so readers won't get lost when I start moving pieces around in scene 3.)