Technically, he is open to the possibility; He says he's 99.9% atheist. It's just that the evidence available is so infinitesimally small in his interpretation that he doesn't believe it necessary.
He's fundamentally a scientist. If new evidence (specifically falsifiable, repeatable and testable evidence) was discovered proving that a god, some gods or even all gods existed, he would accept it, as would I. Until then, I remain unconvinced.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 01:23 pm (UTC)He's fundamentally a scientist. If new evidence (specifically falsifiable, repeatable and testable evidence) was discovered proving that a god, some gods or even all gods existed, he would accept it, as would I. Until then, I remain unconvinced.