oh no, it's the fandom police...
Sep. 10th, 2015 02:59 pmI will never stop finding it fascinating how many people involved in fandom think hate-reviewing is a good idea. It's like they get a mad-on toward one particular character and feel a need to tell anyone who likes (or simply doesn't hate) that character that they are Doing Fandom Wrong.
My latest example, which I received today in regard to Uchiha Sasuke from Naruto:
-------------------
:Boring. they should execute the traitorous bastard. In my eyes, he's worse than Itachi ever was!
-------------------
This also shows up sometimes in the form of the Staunch Defender, who falls in love with a particular interpretation of a character and goes around telling anyone who dislikes that character (or simply likes them in a different way) that they are -- you guessed it -- Doing Fandom Wrong. I think the defenders tend to be a little more frothing and verbose than the haters, but it's all shades of the same impulse: you must like what I like in exactly the way I like it, or else.
Which is both hilarious and sad, and I am sure happens in all fandoms, but Naruto is the one where I run into it personally.
My latest example, which I received today in regard to Uchiha Sasuke from Naruto:
-------------------
:Boring. they should execute the traitorous bastard. In my eyes, he's worse than Itachi ever was!
-------------------
This also shows up sometimes in the form of the Staunch Defender, who falls in love with a particular interpretation of a character and goes around telling anyone who dislikes that character (or simply likes them in a different way) that they are -- you guessed it -- Doing Fandom Wrong. I think the defenders tend to be a little more frothing and verbose than the haters, but it's all shades of the same impulse: you must like what I like in exactly the way I like it, or else.
Which is both hilarious and sad, and I am sure happens in all fandoms, but Naruto is the one where I run into it personally.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-10 07:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-11 02:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-11 12:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-11 02:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-11 01:16 am (UTC)What particularly annoys me is when people review a fic that was written while a series was still in progress (such that you had to extrapolate/speculate some things), just to tell you that you got something "wrong." Especially if the summary/author's note for the fic says something like, "This is my theory about..." or "This is based on an idea someone had regarding..."
(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-11 03:05 am (UTC)I think a lot of people in fandom miss that distinction. *wry*
And yeah, people who criticize a story based on information that didn't exist when that story was written are just infuriating. Seriously, why do they DO THAT?
(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-11 03:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-11 03:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-11 04:08 am (UTC)(I don't understand these people either. Fanfiction is generally not written as an excuse to debate a character???? Or a ship.)
(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-11 04:34 am (UTC)(Yeah, like, I freely admit that I sometimes write a fic to see if I can convince myself of a ship or to lay out a meta theory to my own satisfaction, but they're still stories rather than invitations to an argument. I'm not going to rewrite them if someone accuses me of being Wrong on the internet.)
(no subject)
Date: 2015-09-11 10:17 am (UTC)I think, in part, it's because Kishimoto has terrible gender dynamics and good ones in ways that fandom isn't used to, heh. The other part is probably just how long he strung along the ship tease and character motivation tease. (I was in SasuSaku fandom for most of it, which is, obviously, right in the middle of things.)